Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
N Engl J Med ; 385(25): 2325-2335, 2021 12 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1575626

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Among patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), the use of recombinant human erythropoietin and its derivatives for the treatment of anemia has been linked to a possibly increased risk of stroke, myocardial infarction, and other adverse events. Several trials have suggested that hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors (PHIs) are as effective as erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) in increasing hemoglobin levels. METHODS: In this randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial, we assigned patients with CKD who were undergoing dialysis and who had a hemoglobin level of 8.0 to 11.5 g per deciliter to receive an oral HIF-PHI (daprodustat) or an injectable ESA (epoetin alfa if they were receiving hemodialysis or darbepoetin alfa if they were receiving peritoneal dialysis). The two primary outcomes were the mean change in the hemoglobin level from baseline to weeks 28 through 52 (noninferiority margin, -0.75 g per deciliter) and the first occurrence of a major adverse cardiovascular event (a composite of death from any cause, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke), with a noninferiority margin of 1.25. RESULTS: A total of 2964 patients underwent randomization. The mean (±SD) baseline hemoglobin level was 10.4±1.0 g per deciliter overall. The mean (±SE) change in the hemoglobin level from baseline to weeks 28 through 52 was 0.28±0.02 g per deciliter in the daprodustat group and 0.10±0.02 g per deciliter in the ESA group (difference, 0.18 g per deciliter; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.12 to 0.24), which met the prespecified noninferiority margin of -0.75 g per deciliter. During a median follow-up of 2.5 years, a major adverse cardiovascular event occurred in 374 of 1487 patients (25.2%) in the daprodustat group and in 394 of 1477 (26.7%) in the ESA group (hazard ratio, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.81 to 1.07), which also met the prespecified noninferiority margin for daprodustat. The percentages of patients with other adverse events were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with CKD undergoing dialysis, daprodustat was noninferior to ESAs regarding the change in the hemoglobin level from baseline and cardiovascular outcomes. (Funded by GlaxoSmithKline; ASCEND-D ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02879305.).


Asunto(s)
Anemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Barbitúricos/uso terapéutico , Darbepoetina alfa/uso terapéutico , Epoetina alfa/uso terapéutico , Glicina/análogos & derivados , Hematínicos/uso terapéutico , Diálisis Renal , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/complicaciones , Anciano , Anemia/etiología , Barbitúricos/efectos adversos , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/etiología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/mortalidad , Darbepoetina alfa/efectos adversos , Epoetina alfa/efectos adversos , Femenino , Glicina/efectos adversos , Glicina/uso terapéutico , Hematínicos/efectos adversos , Hemoglobinas/análisis , Humanos , Prolina Dioxigenasas del Factor Inducible por Hipoxia/antagonistas & inhibidores , Análisis de Intención de Tratar , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infarto del Miocardio/epidemiología , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/sangre , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/terapia , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología
2.
N Engl J Med ; 385(25): 2313-2324, 2021 12 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1575625

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Daprodustat is an oral hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor. In patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) who are not undergoing dialysis, the efficacy and safety of daprodustat, as compared with the conventional erythropoiesis-stimulating agent darbepoetin alfa, are unknown. METHODS: In this randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial with blinded adjudication of cardiovascular outcomes, we compared daprodustat with darbepoetin alfa for the treatment of anemia in patients with CKD who were not undergoing dialysis. The primary outcomes were the mean change in the hemoglobin level from baseline to weeks 28 through 52 and the first occurrence of a major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE; a composite of death from any cause, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke). RESULTS: Overall, 3872 patients were randomly assigned to receive daprodustat or darbepoetin alfa. The mean (±SD) baseline hemoglobin levels were similar in the two groups. The mean (±SE) change in the hemoglobin level from baseline to weeks 28 through 52 was 0.74±0.02 g per deciliter in the daprodustat group and 0.66±0.02 g per deciliter in the darbepoetin alfa group (difference, 0.08 g per deciliter; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.03 to 0.13), which met the prespecified noninferiority margin of -0.75 g per deciliter. During a median follow-up of 1.9 years, a first MACE occurred in 378 of 1937 patients (19.5%) in the daprodustat group and in 371 of 1935 patients (19.2%) in the darbepoetin alfa group (hazard ratio, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.89 to 1.19), which met the prespecified noninferiority margin of 1.25. The percentages of patients with adverse events were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with CKD and anemia who were not undergoing dialysis, daprodustat was noninferior to darbepoetin alfa with respect to the change in the hemoglobin level from baseline and with respect to cardiovascular outcomes. (Funded by GlaxoSmithKline; ASCEND-ND ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02876835.).


Asunto(s)
Anemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Barbitúricos/uso terapéutico , Darbepoetina alfa/uso terapéutico , Glicina/análogos & derivados , Hematínicos/uso terapéutico , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/complicaciones , Anciano , Anemia/etiología , Barbitúricos/efectos adversos , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/etiología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/mortalidad , Darbepoetina alfa/efectos adversos , Femenino , Glicina/efectos adversos , Glicina/uso terapéutico , Hematínicos/efectos adversos , Hemoglobinas/análisis , Humanos , Prolina Dioxigenasas del Factor Inducible por Hipoxia/antagonistas & inhibidores , Análisis de Intención de Tratar , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infarto del Miocardio/epidemiología , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/sangre , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología
3.
A A Pract ; 14(9): e01287, 2020 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-992616

RESUMEN

Methemoglobinemia is a rare disorder of the blood in which there is an increase in methemoglobin, which occurs when hemoglobin is present in the oxidized form. Methemoglobin impairs hemoglobin's ability to transport oxygen, produces functional anemia, and leads to tissue hypoxia. We report the successful management of a case of refractory hypoxia due to acutely acquired methemoglobinemia in a patient undergoing treatment for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia. The cause of methemoglobinemia in this patient remains unknown. Hypoxia and methemoglobinemia did not respond to methylene blue and required administration of packed red blood cell transfusions.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus/complicaciones , Hipoxia/etiología , Metahemoglobinemia/complicaciones , Neumonía Viral/complicaciones , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/etiología , Lesión Renal Aguda/complicaciones , Lesión Renal Aguda/terapia , Anciano , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Antioxidantes/uso terapéutico , Ácido Ascórbico/uso terapéutico , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Infecciones por Coronavirus/tratamiento farmacológico , Corynebacterium , Infecciones por Corynebacterium/complicaciones , Infecciones por Corynebacterium/terapia , Síndrome de Liberación de Citoquinas/complicaciones , Inhibidores Enzimáticos/uso terapéutico , Transfusión de Eritrocitos , Hematínicos/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Hidroxocobalamina/uso terapéutico , Hidroxicloroquina/uso terapéutico , Hipoxia/terapia , Masculino , Metahemoglobinemia/terapia , Azul de Metileno/uso terapéutico , Pandemias , Neumonía Bacteriana/complicaciones , Neumonía Bacteriana/terapia , Neumonía Viral/tratamiento farmacológico , Terapia de Reemplazo Renal , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/terapia , SARS-CoV-2 , Choque Séptico/complicaciones
5.
Med Hypotheses ; 140: 109760, 2020 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-101946

RESUMEN

A novel virus named 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV/SARS-CoV-2) causes symptoms that are classified as coronavirus disease (COVID-19). Respiratory conditions are extensively described among more serious cases of COVID-19, and the onset of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is one of the hallmark features of critical COVID-19 cases. ARDS can be directly life-threatening because it is associated with low blood oxygenation levels and can result in organ failure. There are no generally recognized effective treatments for COVID-19, but treatments are urgently needed. Anti-viral medications and vaccines are in the early developmental stages and may take many months or even years to fully develop. At present, management of COVID-19 with respiratory and ventilator support are standard therapeutic treatments, but unfortunately such treatments are associated with high mortality rates. Therefore, it is imperative to consider novel new therapeutic interventions to treat/ameliorate respiratory conditions associated with COVID-19. Alternate treatment strategies utilizing clinically available treatments such as hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT), packed red blood cell (pRBC) transfusions, or erthropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) therapy were hypothesized to increase oxygenation of tissues by alternative means than standard respiratory and ventilator treatments. It was also revealed that alternative treatments currently being considered for COVID-19 such as chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine by increasing hemoglobin production and increasing hemoglobin availability for oxygen binding and acetazolamine (for the treatment of altitude sickness) by causing hyperventilation with associated increasing levels of oxygen and decreasing levels of carbon dioxide in the blood may significantly ameliorate COVID-19 respiratory symptoms. In conclusion, is recommend, given HBOT, pRBC, and ESA therapies are currently available and routinely utilized in the treatment of other conditions, that such therapies be tried among COVID-19 patients with serious respiratory conditions and that future controlled-clinical trials explore the potential usefulness of such treatments among COVID-19 patients with respiratory conditions.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus/mortalidad , Infecciones por Coronavirus/terapia , Neumonía Viral/mortalidad , Neumonía Viral/terapia , Acetazolamida/uso terapéutico , Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Capilares/efectos de los fármacos , Infecciones por Coronavirus/tratamiento farmacológico , Transfusión de Eritrocitos , Hematínicos/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Oxigenoterapia Hiperbárica , Oxígeno/sangre , Pandemias , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/diagnóstico , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/virología , SARS-CoV-2 , Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA